GraphRAG in Theory, Data Hell in Practice

The Unspoken Barrier to Adoption.

What’s in it?

  • Problem: Most AI-ready data is locked in old SQL and document formats.

  • Solution: Use GraphRAG to add accuracy and context to AI with your company's data.

  • Challenge: Manually converting your data to a graph is slow, hard, and expensive.

  • New Help: Automated tools are now emerging to translate non-graph data for you.

  • Result: It's becoming easier to build powerful, reliable AI on all your business knowledge.

From your perspective in the world of technology, you understand the need for powerful tools that can model real-world complexity.

As a developer solving intricate problems, you might have seen firsthand how naturally graph technology represents relationships and connections. It is a powerful approach for building applications that need to navigate complex networks.

However, despite its clear strengths, especially as a robust foundation for modern AI systems, graph technology remains a specialised domain in your industry.

The market, while promising, is still relatively niche. You’re operating in a field where it’s expected to grow significantly, from about $2.3 billion in 2024 to potentially over $15 billion by 2032.

Yet, when you compare this to its long-established rival, the relational database (SQL) market, which was valued at roughly $80 billion last year and is projected to exceed $142 billion by 2033, you see the scale of the incumbent challenge.

The tools you and most of your peers use daily are still overwhelmingly relational.

You know that the relationship-first, graph way of working with data has been proven time and again to be hugely scalable, performant, and fast to boost programmer productivity.

This reputation was earned well before the current AI boom; graph databases delivered tangible benefits in handling connected data at scale.

But what has truly pushed graphs from a valuable tool to an indispensable one in your toolkit has been the rampant growth of generative AI and large language models (LLMs).

Why Graphs Have Become Indispensable for Your AI Projects

While LLMs have become essential enterprise assets for you and your team, they also introduce familiar and frustrating challenges: issues with factual accuracy and a tendency to "hallucinate" information.

For enterprise applications, where reliability is non-negotiable, this is a major hurdle. This is where a technique like GraphRAG has emerged as a compelling solution on your radar.

Defined by Microsoft’s R&D labs as Graphs + Retrieval Augmented Generation, GraphRAG integrates text extraction, network analysis, and LLM prompting into a unified system.

For you, this means GraphRAG enables a richer, more contextual understanding of your company’s data and delivers the reliability you need for production-grade AI.

Your engineering team is likely looking to roll out useful, ChatGPT-style interfaces that colleagues across the business can use to query internal data stores. You understand that a public LLM, no matter how powerful, can’t match the value of one that is effectively grounded in your own corporate knowledge base.

GraphRAG has shot to the top of the charts as a technique for making it significantly easier to help your LLM filter and reason over its internal knowledge base, allowing users to type natural language queries and get succinct, accurate answers.

The Next Level: Boosting Your RAG with Graphs

Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) was impressive on its own for improving LLM accuracy, but from your experience, graph-boosted RAG takes it to another level of precision and contextual depth.

Yet, here’s the core problem you face: the vast majority of the world’s information and certainly most of your company’s valuable data, is still in a non-graph form.

Consider the landscape: relational databases still account for over 62% of all database management system revenue.

Furthermore, analysts like Gartner estimate that 80 to 90% of all new enterprise data is unstructured, everything from text files and emails to PDFs and PowerPoint presentations.

For you, this represents a massive hidden iceberg of valuable data that isn’t in a graph form. It’s data you simply can’t run GraphRAG over directly. This is a common and profound frustration for engineering teams like yours.

You see gigabytes, even terabytes, of company data stored in SQL databases, sitting alongside hundreds or thousands of unstructured documents filled with rich, company-specific information on processes, clients, and products.

Despite its immense potential value, this data remains largely inaccessible and siloed from the powerful GraphRAG workflows you want to implement, simply because it isn’t in the right format.

Your Daunting To-Do List: From Non-Graph Data to Graph Insights

In an ideal, greenfield scenario, your team would have the time and resources to learn graph technologies and query languages like Cypher or Gremlin.

You would systematically build a comprehensive Knowledge Graph out of all your data, and then apply graph algorithms and GraphRAG to unlock transformative insights. But in your reality, especially within a large organisation, you rarely have that luxury. The pressure to deliver is constant.

On top of time constraints, you are managing a massive sunk investment in existing SQL databases, legacy applications, Word documents, and PDF archives. This existing infrastructure represents a substantial barrier to entry. The cost and perceived risk of migration can be paralysing.

Despite these challenges, the allure for you is undeniable: creating a unified Knowledge Graph and unleashing GraphRAG across all enterprise data promises to unlock real, tangible business value. It often feels like a tough pill your engineering team must swallow, a complex, upfront investment for a future payoff.

Your team needs to methodically determine how to translate all that existing data into a format that a graph database can ingest before you can even begin the exciting work of GraphRAG implementation and exploitation.

You know that teams do undertake this work, fully aware it is far from a quick, 30-minute task. It’s a major project.

A key challenge you face is cultural and technical: SQL programmers (who may be you or your colleagues) are trained to think in terms of tables, rows, and columns, not nodes, edges, and properties.

The relational model is often too rigid and simplistic to easily conceptualise the rich, interconnected relationships inherent in your business domain. This mental shift is one of the biggest initial hurdles.

The Core Challenge: Adding Lost Semantic Richness

A fundamental issue you encounter is that SQL databases lack the inherent semantic richness that graph databases are built upon. When you store data in tables linked by foreign keys, much of the meaning and context of the relationships between data points is lost or must be inferred.

A foreign key might tell you that Record A is connected to Record B, but it won’t tell you how or why in a way the computer can natively understand.

Therefore, converting this relational structure into a meaningful graph isn’t a simple one-to-one translation. It requires a deep, nuanced understanding of the underlying business context. The process of translating tables into graphs is painstaking.

One of your greatest challenges lies in transforming domain-specific SQL tables into a graph format while faithfully preserving the original semantics, the intended meaning behind each connection.

You have to figure out what each foreign key actually represents in the real world (e.g., "owns," "supplies," "works for," "located in") and model it explicitly.

This process demands considerable patience and iterative effort, as it requires adapting to an entirely new data paradigm. The same formidable challenge applies to your unstructured data.

Converting thousands of diverse documents into a queryable Knowledge Graph is a complex task.

It involves carefully extracting content, applying a rigorous methodology to identify entities (people, places, products) and the relationships between them, and constructing a graph that accurately captures these rich semantic connections. Doing this manually at scale is where projects stall.

Seeking a Better Way: The Need for Automation

As you read this, there are engineering teams, perhaps like yours, attempting to do all of this manually. They are gritting their teeth as they realise the work of cleaning and extracting useful data from one SQL table or one type of document must be repeated, with tedious minor adjustments, across tens or hundreds more sources.

Other teams are in the difficult position of having to explain to managers that, while certain archives would be immensely valuable to query with AI, the project to extract and model that information with proper provenance will take at least three months of dedicated effort.

This manual mountain has been the primary barrier stopping many teams like yours from adopting GraphRAG. Fortunately, transformative approaches are now beginning to emerge.

The industry is developing ways to automate and optimise what has historically been a major obstacle. Think of it as finding a "Google Translate" for non-graph data, but one that understands semantics, not just syntax.

These new approaches often come in the form of modular, open-source tools or platforms that you can integrate into your projects. They provide you, the developer, with reusable building blocks to efficiently assemble AI and knowledge graph pipelines.

Crucially, they leverage AI-driven automation to handle the complex, repetitive tasks that bog you down: extracting entities and relationships from text, mapping SQL schemas to graph models, and evaluating the quality and accuracy of the resulting Knowledge Graph and AI outputs.

Built-in evaluation capabilities are a game-changer for you, addressing a common pain point in AI development: the lack of non-manual, scalable methods for testing system effectiveness and ensuring accuracy before deployment.

The Path Forward for Your Team

Overall, these new categories of tools are designed to radically streamline the ingestion, transformation, and utilisation of your diverse data sources into Knowledge Graph form. They make it significantly easier for you to develop, test, and iterate on powerful GraphRAG-powered applications.

By tackling scalability, semantic extraction, and quality evaluation as core, automated features, they reduce your need for endless bespoke engineering and cut down on labour-intensive manual processes.

We anticipate that many forward-thinking teams like yours will adopt these automated approaches. They serve as an essential on-ramp for developers and organisations that are not yet fluent in graph technology but need to leverage its power.

They enable true GraphRAG-powered AI productivity without requiring your team to become graph database experts overnight.

For you, this means the door is finally wide open. Graph technology’s days as a secret weapon known only to a cognoscenti of developers are ending.

You now have a pragmatic path to embrace one of the most powerful and modern approaches for making enterprise AI truly work, reliably, contextually, and at scale, by finally being able to connect all your data, not just the fraction that was already in the right format.

Thank you for reading

DataMigration.AI & Team